linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/13] netfs, cifs: Fixes to retry-related code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKPOu+-qYtC0iFWv856JZinO-0E=SEoQ6pOLvc0bZfsbSakR8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 23:44:02 +0200
From: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@...os.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>, Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>, 
	Paulo Alcantara <pc@...guebit.com>, netfs@...ts.linux.dev, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, 
	ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, v9fs@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] netfs, cifs: Fixes to retry-related code

On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 10:22 PM David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> > (The above was 6.15.5 plus all patches in this PR.)
>
> Can you check that, please?  If you have patch 12 applied, then the flags
> should be renumbered and there shouldn't be a NETFS_RREQ_ flag with 13, but
> f=80002020 would seem to have 0x2000 (ie. bit 13) set in it.

Oh, I was slightly wrong, I merged only 12 patches, omitting the
renumbering patch because it had conflicts with my branch, and it was
only a cosmetic change, not relevant for the bug. Sorry for the
confusion!