[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250709-hypersonic-piculet-of-fertility-7c4a82@krzk-bin>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 12:42:35 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Nick Li <nick.li@...rsemi.com>
Cc: lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
xiaoming.yang@...rsemi.com, danyang.zheng@...rsemi.com, like.xy@...mail.com,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] ASoC: dt-bindings: Add schema for FS2104/5S audio
amplifiers
On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 07:28:59PM +0800, Nick Li wrote:
> Add a DT schema for describing FourSemi FS2104/5S
> audio amplifiers which support both I2S and I2C interface.
>
Another unexpected change from v1: subject: why did you add "schema"?
I asked to drop it and gave you reference explaining this. Did you read
it?
So again, same template:
A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "schema for". The
"dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings in
schema format, because they cannot be anything else.
See also:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists