lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87frf4yy50.fsf@trenco.lwn.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 07:27:07 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Akira Yokosawa
 <akiyks@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] docs: kdoc: straighten up dump_declaration()

Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org> writes:

> Em Wed,  2 Jul 2025 16:35:21 -0600
> Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> escreveu:
>
>> Get rid of the excess "return" statements in dump_declaration(), along with
>> a line of never-executed dead code.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
>> ---
>>  scripts/lib/kdoc/kdoc_parser.py | 15 +++++----------
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/scripts/lib/kdoc/kdoc_parser.py b/scripts/lib/kdoc/kdoc_parser.py
>> index 6e35e508608b..7191fa94e17a 100644
>> --- a/scripts/lib/kdoc/kdoc_parser.py
>> +++ b/scripts/lib/kdoc/kdoc_parser.py
>> @@ -878,18 +878,13 @@ class KernelDoc:
>>  
>>          if self.entry.decl_type == "enum":
>>              self.dump_enum(ln, prototype)
>> -            return
>> -
>> -        if self.entry.decl_type == "typedef":
>> +        elif self.entry.decl_type == "typedef":
>>              self.dump_typedef(ln, prototype)
>> -            return
>> -
>> -        if self.entry.decl_type in ["union", "struct"]:
>> +        elif self.entry.decl_type in ["union", "struct"]:
>>              self.dump_struct(ln, prototype)
>> -            return
>> -
>
> The above LGTM.
>
>> -        self.output_declaration(self.entry.decl_type, prototype,
>> -                                entry=self.entry)
>> +        else:
>> +            # This would be a bug
>> +            self.emit_message(ln, f'Unknown declaration type: {self.entry.decl_type}')
>
> Hmm... Are you sure about that? If I'm not mistaken, this was used for
> other types of arguments, like DOC: tags.

DOC tags are handled in a different path entirely.  I did ensure that
the code in question was never executed ... but then left the message in
place just in case.

Thanks,

jon

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ