linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,videocc: Add sc8180x compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c9bd8760-1c85-4aa6-9633-1f52ed4952c9@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 15:27:43 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>,
 Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>, Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
 Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,videocc: Add sc8180x
 compatible

On 10/07/2025 15:00, Satya Priya Kakitapalli wrote:
> The sc8180x video clock controller block is identical to that
> of sm8150. Add a new compatible string for sc8180x videocc and
> use sm8150 as fallback.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,videocc.yaml    | 23 +++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>

<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
"received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost
patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for
tags received on the version they apply.

Please read:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof