linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,videocc: Add sc8180x compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b197ef12-652b-4c7a-97d2-49954e9f1384@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 15:34:07 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>,
 Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>, Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
 Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,videocc: Add sc8180x
 compatible

On 10/07/2025 15:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 10/07/2025 15:00, Satya Priya Kakitapalli wrote:
>> The sc8180x video clock controller block is identical to that
>> of sm8150. Add a new compatible string for sc8180x videocc and
>> use sm8150 as fallback.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,videocc.yaml    | 23 +++++++++++++---------
>>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> 
> 
> <form letter>
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
> 
> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

Apologies, wrong keyword. It is supposed to be this one:

---

<form letter>
This is an automated instruction, just in case, because many review tags
are being ignored. If you know the process, you can skip it (please do
not feel offended by me posting it here - no bad intentions intended).
If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:

Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
"received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost
patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for
tags received on the version they apply.

Full context and explanation:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof