[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <0a66b263-0d5d-4758-b6b5-fc3905612d10@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 20:01:40 +0200
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: "Lyude Paul" <lyude@...hat.com>, "Dave Airlie" <airlied@...il.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@...ll.ch>, "bskeggs@...hat.com" <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
"Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs@...dia.com>, "Timur Tabi" <ttabi@...dia.com>,
"Dave Airlie" <airlied@...hat.com>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@...e.de>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
"nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org" <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: check ioctl command codes better
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025, at 19:41, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Fri Jul 11, 2025 at 9:24 AM CEST, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
>> index 1527b801f013..506eeb44f0d4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
>> @@ -1284,6 +1284,9 @@ nouveau_ioctls[] = {
>> DRM_IOCTL_DEF_DRV(NOUVEAU_EXEC, nouveau_exec_ioctl_exec, DRM_RENDER_ALLOW),
>> };
>>
>> +#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_NVIV _IOC(_IOC_READ|_IOC_WRITE, DRM_IOCTL_BASE, \
>> + DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_NVIF, 0)
>
> Is there any intention behind NVIV vs NVIF? Indicator that size is not
> considered?
No, just a typo, my mistake.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists