[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250712104006.GA13512@wp.pl>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2025 12:40:06 +0200
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@...pl>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Rosen Penev <rosenp@...il.com>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:MIPS" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 wireless-next 7/7] dt-bindings: net: wireless: rt2800:
add
Hi Krzysztof,
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 09:48:49AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 03:40:30PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 2:40 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 10/07/2025 22:08, Rosen Penev wrote:
> > > > Add device-tree bindings for the RT2800 SOC wifi device found in older
> > > > Ralink/Mediatek devices.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@...il.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > .../bindings/net/wireless/ralink,rt2800.yaml | 47 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
> > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ralink,rt2800.yaml
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ralink,rt2800.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ralink,rt2800.yaml
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000000000000..8c13b25bd8b4
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ralink,rt2800.yaml
> > >
> > > Filename should match compatible. You were already changing something
> > > here...
> > hrm? that makes no sense. Various drivers have multiple compatible lines.
>
> Luckily we do not speak about drivers here. Anyway, follow standard
> review practices, you don't get special rules.
Could you please elaborate what you mean ?
I greped through Documentation/devicetree/bindings/*/*.yaml and plenty
of "compatible:" items do not match the filename. So hard to tell
what rule you are referencing, as it seems it's not really applied.
Regards
Stanislaw
Powered by blists - more mailing lists