lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3c031732-9090-454c-b52a-a5c01135f466@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2025 09:22:46 +0800
From: "lihuisong (C)" <lihuisong@...wei.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>
CC: <xuwei5@...wei.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <zhanjie9@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: hisilicon: kunpeng_hccs: Fix incorrect log
 information


在 2025/7/11 18:38, Jonathan Cameron 写道:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 14:37:06 +0800
> Huisong Li <lihuisong@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>> The hccs_get_all_spec_port_idle_sta() will tell user which port
>> is busy when firmware doesn't allow to decrease HCCS lane number.
>> However, the current log prints the index of die and port instead
>> of the hardware ID user perceived.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@...wei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
>
> Maybe adding an example of a wrong print and how it is fixed to this
> patch description would make the problem even more obvious?
Yes.
The problem and modification are very simple, and this description is 
also enough.
> Not worth respin for that though!
ok, thanks for your review.
>
>> ---
>>   drivers/soc/hisilicon/kunpeng_hccs.c | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/hisilicon/kunpeng_hccs.c b/drivers/soc/hisilicon/kunpeng_hccs.c
>> index 7fc353732d55..65ff45fdcac7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/hisilicon/kunpeng_hccs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/hisilicon/kunpeng_hccs.c
>> @@ -1295,11 +1295,11 @@ static int hccs_get_all_spec_port_idle_sta(struct hccs_dev *hdev, u8 port_type,
>>   				if (ret) {
>>   					dev_err(hdev->dev,
>>   						"hccs%u on chip%u/die%u get idle status failed, ret = %d.\n",
>> -						k, i, j, ret);
>> +						port->port_id, chip->chip_id, die->die_id, ret);
>>   					return ret;
>>   				} else if (idle == 0) {
>>   					dev_info(hdev->dev, "hccs%u on chip%u/die%u is busy.\n",
>> -						k, i, j);
>> +						 port->port_id, chip->chip_id, die->die_id);
>>   					return 0;
>>   				}
>>   			}

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ