[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DBB3M49I0GX0.2OZJA23EQPP8Z@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2025 19:20:48 +0200
From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org>
To: "Benno Lossin" <lossin@...nel.org>
Cc: "Daniel Almeida" <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>, "Miguel Ojeda"
<ojeda@...nel.org>, "Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, "Boqun Feng"
<boqun.feng@...il.com>, "Gary Guo" <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, "Andreas
Hindborg" <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, "Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@...ch.edu>, "Greg Kroah-Hartman"
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>, "Bjorn Helgaas"
<bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Krzysztof Wilczyński
<kwilczynski@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] rust: irq: add support for non-threaded IRQs and
handlers
On Sun Jul 13, 2025 at 5:29 PM CEST, Benno Lossin wrote:
> I think this solution sounds much better than storing an additional
> `NonNull<Device<Bound>>`.
I can send two patches for that. The IRQ abstractions have to either land
through driver-core or in the next cycle anyways.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists