[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250714143443.GF1870174@ziepe.ca>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 11:34:43 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>, jasonmiu@...gle.com,
graf@...zon.com, changyuanl@...gle.com, dmatlack@...gle.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, corbet@....net, rdunlap@...radead.org,
ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, kanie@...ux.alibaba.com,
ojeda@...nel.org, aliceryhl@...gle.com, masahiroy@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tj@...nel.org, yoann.congal@...le.fr,
mmaurer@...gle.com, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, chenridong@...wei.com,
axboe@...nel.dk, mark.rutland@....com, jannh@...gle.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, david@...hat.com,
joel.granados@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
anna.schumaker@...cle.com, song@...nel.org, zhangguopeng@...inos.cn,
linux@...ssschuh.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, rafael@...nel.org, dakr@...nel.org,
bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org, cw00.choi@...sung.com,
myungjoo.ham@...sung.com, yesanishhere@...il.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com,
aleksander.lobakin@...el.com, ira.weiny@...el.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, leon@...nel.org, lukas@...ner.de,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, wagi@...nel.org, djeffery@...hat.com,
stuart.w.hayes@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 10/16] luo: luo_ioctl: add ioctl interface
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 10:26:45AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> IIUC Christian's point was mostly not about using VFS APIs (i.e.
> read/write) but about using a special pseudo fs rather than devtmpfs to
> drive ioctls.
>
> So instead of
>
> fd = open("/dev/liveupdate", ...);
> ioctl(fd, ...);
>
> we'd use
>
> fd = open("/sys/fs/kexec/control", ...);
> ioctl(fd, ...);
Please no, /sys/ is much worse.
/dev/ has lots of infrastructure to control permissions/etc that /sys/
does not.
If you want to do ioctls to something that you open() is a character
dev and you accept the limitations with namespaces, coarse permissions
and so on.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists