linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 4/9] rust: sync: atomic: Add generic atomics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72mFa0bM_DZV2tHViU0SKqNG_tX6AxBWz4AQ=2UmBrt=nQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 16:34:39 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, lkmm@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, 
	Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, 
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, 
	Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, 
	Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, 
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, 
	Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, 
	Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, 
	Mitchell Levy <levymitchell0@...il.com>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, 
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/9] rust: sync: atomic: Add generic atomics

On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 4:22 PM Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hmm.. why? This is the further information about what the above
> "Examples" section just mentioned?

I think Benno may be trying to point out is may be confusing what
"this" may be referring to, i.e. is it referring to something concrete
about the example, or about `from_ptr` as a whole / in all cases?

Cheers,
Miguel