[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ef319052-4fe7-4512-a6b0-e9148e1414f4@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 10:28:56 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, avri.altman@....com,
ebiggers@...gle.com, neil.armstrong@...aro.org,
konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
"Bao D. Nguyen" <quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Update esi_vec_mask for HW
major version >= 6
On 7/14/25 10:25 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>>> Maybe we should get rid of 'scsi' prefix since the ufs code is now
>>> moved outside of drivers/scsi/. Bart?
>
>> Dropping the "scsi:" prefix sounds good to me because this prefix makes
>> patch subject lines a bit long.
>
> I have attempting separating SCSI and UFS a couple of times in the past.
> However, there always seemed to be at least one SCSI core change
> dependency per cycle which prevented that from happening.
>
> I don't think we have had any for a while so I'll try to do two separate
> trees for 6.18.
Hi Martin,
Thanks for the feedback, but please keep in mind that I plan to repost
this patch series soon, a series that includes SCSI core and UFS driver
changes: "[PATCH 00/24] Optimize the hot path in the UFS driver"
(https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20250403211937.2225615-1-bvanassche@acm.org/).
For the future, I expect such patch changes to be
the exception rather than the norm.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists