linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Update esi_vec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yq1jz4a8z8h.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 13:25:18 -0400
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        Nitin Rawat
 <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>,
        James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        avri.altman@....com, ebiggers@...gle.com, neil.armstrong@...aro.org,
        konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        "Bao D. Nguyen" <quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Update esi_vec_mask for HW
 major version >= 6


Bart,

>> Maybe we should get rid of 'scsi' prefix since the ufs code is now
>> moved outside of drivers/scsi/. Bart?

> Dropping the "scsi:" prefix sounds good to me because this prefix makes
> patch subject lines a bit long.

I have attempting separating SCSI and UFS a couple of times in the past.
However, there always seemed to be at least one SCSI core change
dependency per cycle which prevented that from happening.

I don't think we have had any for a while so I'll try to do two separate
trees for 6.18.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen