linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Update esi_vec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5a1bd678-c935-4c1b-812d-a249f1caebb7@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 09:18:42 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
 Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>
Cc: James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
 avri.altman@....com, ebiggers@...gle.com, neil.armstrong@...aro.org,
 konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
 "Bao D. Nguyen" <quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Update esi_vec_mask for HW
 major version >= 6

On 7/8/25 12:53 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 02:32:58AM GMT, Nitin Rawat wrote:
>> From: "Bao D. Nguyen" <quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>
> 
> Nit: Please use consistent subject prefix:
> 
> scsi: ufs: qcom:
> 
> Maybe we should get rid of 'scsi' prefix since the ufs code is now moved
> outside of drivers/scsi/. Bart?
Dropping the "scsi:" prefix sounds good to me because this prefix makes
patch subject lines a bit long.

Thanks,

Bart.