linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pata_rdc: Use registered definition for the RDC vendor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aHSt65bhITAzN_2x@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 10:12:43 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pata_rdc: Use registered definition for the RDC
 vendor

On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 09:32:09AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 7/11/25 8:36 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Convert to PCI_VDEVICE() and use registered definition for RDC vendor
> > from pci_ids.h.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Commit title needs "ata: " prefix. Niklas, can you add it when applying ?

I took the output of

$ git log --oneline --no-merges -- drivers/ata/pata_rdc.c

and tried to deduct what will be the driver specific prefix, there are no
ata: pata_rdc: prefixed changes, so it appears that I made wrong assumption.

> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@....com>

Thanks!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko