linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pata_rdc: Use registered definition for the RDC vendor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2e63f7ec-f9ed-4ad3-b27b-a5d6e120bff6@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 16:14:14 +0900
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pata_rdc: Use registered definition for the RDC
 vendor

On 7/14/25 4:12 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 09:32:09AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> On 7/11/25 8:36 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> Convert to PCI_VDEVICE() and use registered definition for RDC vendor
>>> from pci_ids.h.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
>>
>> Commit title needs "ata: " prefix. Niklas, can you add it when applying ?
> 
> I took the output of
> 
> $ git log --oneline --no-merges -- drivers/ata/pata_rdc.c
> 
> and tried to deduct what will be the driver specific prefix, there are no
> ata: pata_rdc: prefixed changes, so it appears that I made wrong assumption.

It is probably because that driver has not been touched in a long time :)
These days, we try to be consistent with the patch titles and have the "ata: "
prefix for all of them to make git log searches easier.


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research