[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <05fbc6c9-0b6a-42bd-8940-242c80a79b7f@linux.dev>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 12:05:15 -0400
From: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] hwmon: iio: Add min/max support
On 7/15/25 04:41, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 09:20:22PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> Add support for minimum/maximum attributes. Like the _input attribute,
>> we just need to call into the IIO API.
>
> ...
>
>> +static ssize_t iio_hwmon_read_event(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>> + char *buf)
>> +{
>> + struct sensor_device_attribute_2 *sattr = to_sensor_dev_attr_2(attr);
>> + struct iio_hwmon_state *state = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + struct iio_channel *chan = &state->channels[sattr->index];
>> + int ret, result, scale;
>> +
>> + scale = iio_hwmon_scale(chan);
>
>> + if (scale < 0)
>
> This part is definitely missed in the respective description.
OK
>> + return scale;
>> +
>> + ret = iio_read_event_processed_scale(chan, IIO_EV_TYPE_THRESH,
>> + sattr->nr, IIO_EV_INFO_VALUE,
>> + &result, scale);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>
> Why ' < 0' here?
This originally returned IIO_VAL_INT on success.
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", result);
>
> Mustn't be sysfs_emit() ?
It doesn't matter in this case (as %d can never emit more
than 20ish characters), but that works too.
>> +}
>
> ...
>
>> + ret = iio_write_event_processed_scale(chan, IIO_EV_TYPE_THRESH,
>> + sattr->nr, IIO_EV_INFO_VALUE,
>> + val, scale);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>
> < 0 ?
>
>> + return ret;
>
> ...
>
>> +static int add_event_attr(struct device *dev, struct iio_hwmon_state *st,
>> + int i, enum iio_event_direction dir,
>> + const char *fmt, ...)
>
> Same comments as per previous patch adding another attribute API.
>
> ...
>
>> + va_start(ap, fmt);
>> + a->dev_attr.attr.name = devm_kvasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, fmt, ap);
>> + va_end(ap);
>
> Can't %pV be used?
%pV is for when we have additional info to add. e.g. if we were doing
devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "my_extra_info_%d_%pV", i, &vaf);
but we aren't so there's no point adding a level of indirection.
--Sean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists