[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bd7cab62-f0ba-440d-8dc2-3304afe884df@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 10:19:14 +0300
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
<mchehab@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/15] Add dt-bindings and dtsi changes for CAMSS on
x1e80100 silicon
On 7/15/25 10:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15/07/2025 08:53, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>>
>> 2. The whole new changes for legacy/new CSIPHY support is not present
>> in v1-v6 of this changeset, it just appears out of nowhere in the v7,
>> and since it is broken it should be removed from v8 expectedly.
>
>
> Why? If it is broken, should be fixed in v8, not dropped from v8.
There is a conflict between these new v7 changes and another old and
still unreviewed/uncommented changeset, which provides quite a similar
functionality, but it has slightly different CSIPHY device tree node
descriptions and their connections to CAMSS.
This technical conflict should be resolved before making a bet which
one of two CHIPHY series is better and should be fixed in the next
version.
--
Best wishes,
Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists