linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 00/15] Add dt-bindings and dtsi changes for CAMSS on x1e80100 silicon

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8323e152-eb08-4a60-97e5-7b50b2aea7a3@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 09:46:13 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
 Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
 <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
 Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
 <mchehab@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-media@...r.kernel.org, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/15] Add dt-bindings and dtsi changes for CAMSS on
 x1e80100 silicon

On 15/07/2025 09:19, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> On 7/15/25 10:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 15/07/2025 08:53, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>>>
>>> 2. The whole new changes for legacy/new CSIPHY support is not present
>>> in v1-v6 of this changeset, it just appears out of nowhere in the v7,
>>> and since it is broken it should be removed from v8 expectedly.
>>
>>
>> Why? If it is broken, should be fixed in v8, not dropped from v8.
> 
> There is a conflict between these new v7 changes and another old and
> still unreviewed/uncommented changeset, which provides quite a similar
> functionality, but it has slightly different CSIPHY device tree node
> descriptions and their connections to CAMSS.
> 
> This technical conflict should be resolved before making a bet which

Not really. People can propose different ideas, although I understand
possible disappointment. You don't get however monopoly on doing something.

> one of two CHIPHY series is better and should be fixed in the next
> version.


Please provide links, otherwise it feels you are pushing back someone's
idea for really vague reason.

Best regards,
Krzysztof