linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 02/16] dt-bindings: stm32: stm32mp25: add `access-controller-cell` property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a1d1970c-da5d-4b4a-a69a-bf9da7a07be2@foss.st.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 10:40:13 +0200
From: Gatien CHEVALLIER <gatien.chevallier@...s.st.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Clément Le Goffic
	<clement.legoffic@...s.st.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland
	<mark.rutland@....com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor
 Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        Philipp Zabel
	<p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Michael Turquette
	<mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Gabriel Fernandez
	<gabriel.fernandez@...s.st.com>,
        Le Goffic <legoffic.clement@...il.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/16] dt-bindings: stm32: stm32mp25: add
 `access-controller-cell` property



On 7/15/25 10:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 09:37:00AM +0200, Gatien CHEVALLIER wrote:
>> Hello Rob,
>>
>> On 7/15/25 05:17, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 04:48:54PM +0200, Clément Le Goffic wrote:
>>>> RCC is able to check the availability of a clock.
>>>> Allow to query the RCC with a firewall ID.
>>>
>>> If it is tied to a clock, do we need another provider? We have the
>>> "protected clocks" thing, but that might be a bit different.
>>>
>>
>> I couldn't find any reference to "protected-clocks" outside of qcom
>> related code, is there a documentation? (Couldn't find it in
>> clocks.yaml).
> 
> Huh? protected-clocks is in clocks.yaml... It is there with an explanation.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

Ah, I was looking at Rob's repo, my bad.