[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ae960a16-65ad-4b22-b9fb-89efbffacd3e@foss.st.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 10:32:09 +0200
From: Clement LE GOFFIC <clement.legoffic@...s.st.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue
<alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Gatien Chevallier
<gatien.chevallier@...s.st.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Gabriel Fernandez
<gabriel.fernandez@...s.st.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Le
Goffic <legoffic.clement@...il.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/16] arm64: dts: st: add LPDDR channel to
stm32mp257f-dk board
Hi Rob,
Thanks for the review !
On 7/15/25 05:20, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 04:48:58PM +0200, Clément Le Goffic wrote:
>> Add 32bits LPDDR4 channel to the stm32mp257f-dk board.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Clément Le Goffic <clement.legoffic@...s.st.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp257f-dk.dts | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp257f-dk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp257f-dk.dts
>> index a278a1e3ce03..a97b41f14ecc 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp257f-dk.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp257f-dk.dts
>> @@ -54,6 +54,13 @@ led-blue {
>> };
>> };
>>
>> + lpddr_channel: lpddr4-channel {
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> + compatible = "jedec,lpddr4-channel";
>
> Not tested because this doesn't match the binding.
Hmm, I've tested with make dtbs_check and dt_binding_check and it didn't
complain on my side.
What I have miss ?
>
>> + io-width = <32>;
>> + };
>
> What would multiple channels look like? I think this needs some work.
> Like it should perhaps be within the memory node. It's a lot to just say
> 32-bit LPDDR4 x1.
I guess something like two channels node following each other in the DT.
It can be in the memory node I don't know what are the stakes here.
I was inspired by the lpddr node here:
arch/arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos5422-odroid-core.dtsi:336
Best regard,
Clément
Powered by blists - more mailing lists