linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH liburing v2 0/3] Bring back `CONFIG_HAVE_MEMFD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOG64qO1S+hd+cgabQn6uYMPGAMm7V-FRmm6btytZE270bEebA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 21:28:10 +0700
From: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <alviro.iskandar@...weeb.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@...weeb.org>, "GNU/Weeb Mailing List" <gwml@...r.gnuweeb.org>, 
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	io-uring Mailing List <io-uring@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH liburing v2 0/3] Bring back `CONFIG_HAVE_MEMFD_CREATE` to
 fix Android build error

On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 7:41 PM Jens Axboe wrote:
> For patch 1, maybe just bring back the configure test and not bother
> with a revert style commit? There is nothing in test/ that uses
> memfd_create, so there's no point bringing it back in there.

Ah yea. That'd be easier. I'll copy the configure part instead of
modifying the git revert result 😆

> IOW, patch 2 can be dropped, as it's really just dropping bits
> that patch 1 re-added for some reason.
>
> All that's needed is to add it to the examples/ helpers. If it's
> needed for test/ later, then it can get added at that time.
>
> All of that to say, I'd just add the configure bit and the examples/
> helper in a single patch and not worry about test/ at all.

Understandable. I'll send a v3 revision shortly.

-- Viro