[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250716-realistic-cream-ammonite-304cca@houat>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 17:06:15 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/tests: edid: Update CTA-861 HDMI Vendor Specific
Data Block
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 01:02:33PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 25.06.25 um 17:14 schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> > For some reason, the HDMI VSDBs in our kunit EDIDs had a length longer
> > than expected.
> >
> > While this was harmless, we should get rid of it to make it somewhat
> > predictable.
>
> Dump question: should these errors be kept in another test specifically for
> detecting this problem?
I'm not entirely sure what you mean here, sorry. Did you mean that we
should get some tests to prevent that kind of EDIDs from being accepted
by the kernel?
If so, I guess it would mean getting a test suite for the EDID parser
itself, which is definitely something that should happen at some point
but seems a little out of scope to me.
Maxime
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (274 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists