[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <89bce051-3732-48a8-9679-11a404bbbfb3@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 17:34:15 +0200
From: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
To: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/tests: edid: Update CTA-861 HDMI Vendor Specific
Data Block
Hi
Am 16.07.25 um 17:06 schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 01:02:33PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 25.06.25 um 17:14 schrieb Maxime Ripard:
>>> For some reason, the HDMI VSDBs in our kunit EDIDs had a length longer
>>> than expected.
>>>
>>> While this was harmless, we should get rid of it to make it somewhat
>>> predictable.
>> Dump question: should these errors be kept in another test specifically for
>> detecting this problem?
> I'm not entirely sure what you mean here, sorry. Did you mean that we
> should get some tests to prevent that kind of EDIDs from being accepted
> by the kernel?
>
> If so, I guess it would mean getting a test suite for the EDID parser
> itself, which is definitely something that should happen at some point
> but seems a little out of scope to me.
OK. I meant that these are ill-formed EDIDs and the kernel's EDID
processing should handle them gracefully. A test could verify this. Not
a blocker for this series, of course.
Best regards
Thomas
>
> Maxime
--
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman
HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists