[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250716090240.PHfqyEfL@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 11:02:40 +0200
From: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
To: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tomas Glozar <tglozar@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <jlelli@...hat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/17] rv: Retry when da monitor detects race
conditions
On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 10:59:44AM +0200, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-07-16 at 10:45 +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 10:38:11AM +0200, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> > > Yes you can, but I wouldn't do so silently.
> >
> > Why not? The absolute worst that we get, is the rare case where a bug
> > appears at the exact same time. In that case, we would get a false
> > negative.
> >
> > And I think that is really really rare.
>
> Well, we wouldn't even know how rare it is because we don't track it!
>
> It may be a harmless note but might also be a design flaw in the
> monitor, so it should be possible to understand when it happens.
Oh, so you just want to track when this happens, as a RV developer. That
makes sense.
Just make sure it won't confuse other people who use the monitors to test
the kernel.
Best regards,
Nam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists