[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xdvsnmcgfk7kkeq4r43l2c3h4vrlhuy4s6g2nybzsibyna3ipd@tkb7elmgn5m5>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 03:52:55 -0700
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
acpica-devel@...ts.linux.dev, kernel-team@...a.com, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, osandov@...com, leo.yan@....com, rmikey@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: Mark kernel as tainted on SAE and SError panic
Hello Mark,
On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 11:19:38AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 02:42:01AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > Set TAINT_MACHINE_CHECK when SError or Synchronous External Abort (SEA)
> > interrupts trigger a panic to flag potential hardware faults. This
> > tainting mechanism aids in debugging and enables correlation of
> > hardware-related crashes in large-scale deployments.
> >
> > This change aligns with similar patches[1] that mark machine check
> > events when the system crashes due to hardware errors.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250702-add_tain-v1-1-9187b10914b9@debian.org/ [1]
> > Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Also taint the kernel on Synchronous External Abort panics (Will Deacon)
> > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250714-vmcore_hw_error-v1-1-8cf45edb6334@debian.org
>
> I think something went wrong when respinning this patch, because the v1
> link above is incorrect, and should be:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20250710-arm_serror-v1-1-2a3def3740d7@debian.org/
>
> The Cc header for this posting matches that of the unrelated patch (and
> excludes Will, Catalin, etc), rather than that of the real v1. The
> change-id trailer also doesn't match v1.
>
> The actual patch and commit message look fine to me, so:
Sorry about it, it was totally my mess with b4 on two different
machines/branches. I've been testing it on a arm64 hosts that
has no email access. When I picked the patch into the machine with
email, I messed up where to cherry pick and branches.
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
>
> I assume that Will or Catalin will be happy to pick this up. I've added
> those missing folk to this reply, so I don't imagine this should need a
> respin.
Thanks. I will not respin then (unless requested).
Sorry for the mess,
--breno
Powered by blists - more mailing lists