linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/14] vdso/gettimeofday: Return bool from clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6bee5ae0-2a9e-4793-a5bd-9e6c72b03f27@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 13:25:06 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
	Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
	John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
	Christopher Hall <christopher.s.hall@...el.com>,
	Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>,
	Werner Abt <werner.abt@...nberg-usa.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
	Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>, Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/14] vdso/gettimeofday: Return bool from
 clock_gettime() helpers

On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 10:04:21AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On 09.07.2025 09:34, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 05:49:18PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:

> > This fix looks correct to me.

> > tglx:

> > Are you going to fold the fix into the commit or do you want a proper patch?

> > Marek:

> > If a new patch is required, do you want to send it? You found and fixed the
> > issue after all. If not, I'll take care of it.

> If it is possible to fold it into original patch then go ahead, it would 
> make less noise imho. If you need a formal patch, I can send it in a few 
> minutes.

This issue has been present in -next for a week and is causing a bunch
of disruption to tests that end up relying on the vDSO - do we have any
news on getting a fix merged?  Perhaps it makes sense for Marek to just
send his patch so that it's there if needed?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)