linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/14] vdso/gettimeofday: Return bool from clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250716142933-41089f40-0628-4821-83a3-fddbd4c4f9bf@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 14:34:52 +0200
From: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, 
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, 
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, 
	Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, 
	John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, 
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, 
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, Christopher Hall <christopher.s.hall@...el.com>, 
	Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>, Werner Abt <werner.abt@...nberg-usa.com>, 
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>, 
	Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>, Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/14] vdso/gettimeofday: Return bool from
 clock_gettime() helpers

On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 01:25:06PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 10:04:21AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > On 09.07.2025 09:34, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 05:49:18PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> 
> > > This fix looks correct to me.
> 
> > > tglx:
> 
> > > Are you going to fold the fix into the commit or do you want a proper patch?
> 
> > > Marek:
> 
> > > If a new patch is required, do you want to send it? You found and fixed the
> > > issue after all. If not, I'll take care of it.
> 
> > If it is possible to fold it into original patch then go ahead, it would 
> > make less noise imho. If you need a formal patch, I can send it in a few 
> > minutes.
> 
> This issue has been present in -next for a week and is causing a bunch
> of disruption to tests that end up relying on the vDSO - do we have any
> news on getting a fix merged?  Perhaps it makes sense for Marek to just
> send his patch so that it's there if needed?

That fix has been in -next since next-20250710.
If you still have issues, I'll take a look.


Thomas