[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202507162133.0p74u7j1-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 21:15:43 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Arseniy Velikanov <me@...merle.pw>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
Arseniy Velikanov <me@...merle.pw>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] clk: mediatek: Add MT6789 clock controllers
Hi Arseniy,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on clk/clk-next]
[also build test ERROR on robh/for-next pza/reset/next linus/master v6.16-rc6 next-20250715]
[cannot apply to pza/imx-drm/next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Arseniy-Velikanov/clk-mediatek-Add-MT6789-clock-controllers/20250716-062512
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git clk-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250715222221.29406-2-me%40adomerle.pw
patch subject: [PATCH v1 2/2] clk: mediatek: Add MT6789 clock controllers
config: m68k-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250716/202507162133.0p74u7j1-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250716/202507162133.0p74u7j1-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202507162133.0p74u7j1-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt6789-imp_iic_wrap.c:13:
>> drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt6789-imp_iic_wrap.c:33:27: error: 'CLK_IMP_IIC_WRAP_W_I2C0' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'CLK_IMP_IIC_WRAP_W_I2C1'?
33 | GATE_IMP_IIC_WRAP(CLK_IMP_IIC_WRAP_W_I2C0, "imp_iic_wrap_w_i2c0", "top_i2c", 0),
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-gate.h:41:23: note: in definition of macro 'GATE_MTK_FLAGS'
41 | .id = _id, \
| ^~~
drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt6789-imp_iic_wrap.c:33:9: note: in expansion of macro 'GATE_IMP_IIC_WRAP'
33 | GATE_IMP_IIC_WRAP(CLK_IMP_IIC_WRAP_W_I2C0, "imp_iic_wrap_w_i2c0", "top_i2c", 0),
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +33 drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt6789-imp_iic_wrap.c
31
32 static const struct mtk_gate imp_iic_wrap_w_clks[] = {
> 33 GATE_IMP_IIC_WRAP(CLK_IMP_IIC_WRAP_W_I2C0, "imp_iic_wrap_w_i2c0", "top_i2c", 0),
34 GATE_IMP_IIC_WRAP(CLK_IMP_IIC_WRAP_W_I2C1, "imp_iic_wrap_w_i2c1", "top_i2c", 1),
35 };
36
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists