[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250717090318.22708-2-bacs@librecast.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 09:03:19 +0000
From: Brett A C Sheffield <bacs@...recast.net>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
brauner@...nel.org,
broonie@...nel.org,
conor@...nel.org,
f.fainelli@...il.com,
hargar@...rosoft.com,
jack@...e.cz,
jannh@...gle.com,
jonathanh@...dia.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux@...ck-us.net,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
patches@...nelci.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev,
pavel@...x.de,
rwarsow@....de,
shuah@...nel.org,
srw@...dewatkins.net,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
Brett A C Sheffield <bacs@...recast.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/111] 6.6.99-rc2 review
# Librecast Test Results
010/010 [ OK ] libmld
119/120 [FAIL] liblibrecast
CPU/kernel: Linux auntie 6.6.99-rc2-gefb1c34bdf5c #17 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Jul 17 08:51:06 -00 2025 x86_64 AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
There is one failing test with the 6.6 series kernels that I started digging into yesterday, but as this fails on *all* 6.6 kernels right back to 6.6.0 this isn't a regression in this RC so there is no reason to delay 6.6.99 for this. Works fine in 6.5.0 and in more recent kernels > 6.8. Will report this separately when I have more information.
Tested-by: Brett A C Sheffield <bacs@...recast.net>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists