linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/3] perf/x86/intel: Change macro GLOBAL_CTRL_EN_PERF_METRICS to BIT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250717090302.11316-2-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 17:03:01 +0800
From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Eranian Stephane <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...el.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>,
	Yi Lai <yi1.lai@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] perf/x86/intel: Change macro GLOBAL_CTRL_EN_PERF_METRICS to BIT_ULL(48)

Macro GLOBAL_CTRL_EN_PERF_METRICS is defined to 48 instead of
BIT_ULL(48), it's inconsistent with other similar macros. This leads to
this macro is quite easily used wrongly since users thinks it's a
bit-mask just like other similar macros.

Thus change GLOBAL_CTRL_EN_PERF_METRICS to BIT_ULL(48) and eliminate
this potential misuse.

Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Yi Lai <yi1.lai@...el.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c      | 8 ++++----
 arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index c2fb729c270e..1ee4480089aa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -5318,9 +5318,9 @@ static void intel_pmu_check_hybrid_pmus(struct x86_hybrid_pmu *pmu)
 						0, x86_pmu_num_counters(&pmu->pmu), 0, 0);
 
 	if (pmu->intel_cap.perf_metrics)
-		pmu->intel_ctrl |= 1ULL << GLOBAL_CTRL_EN_PERF_METRICS;
+		pmu->intel_ctrl |= GLOBAL_CTRL_EN_PERF_METRICS;
 	else
-		pmu->intel_ctrl &= ~(1ULL << GLOBAL_CTRL_EN_PERF_METRICS);
+		pmu->intel_ctrl &= ~GLOBAL_CTRL_EN_PERF_METRICS;
 
 	intel_pmu_check_event_constraints(pmu->event_constraints,
 					  pmu->cntr_mask64,
@@ -5455,7 +5455,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_cpu_starting(int cpu)
 		rdmsrq(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, perf_cap.capabilities);
 		if (!perf_cap.perf_metrics) {
 			x86_pmu.intel_cap.perf_metrics = 0;
-			x86_pmu.intel_ctrl &= ~(1ULL << GLOBAL_CTRL_EN_PERF_METRICS);
+			x86_pmu.intel_ctrl &= ~GLOBAL_CTRL_EN_PERF_METRICS;
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -7789,7 +7789,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 	}
 
 	if (!is_hybrid() && x86_pmu.intel_cap.perf_metrics)
-		x86_pmu.intel_ctrl |= 1ULL << GLOBAL_CTRL_EN_PERF_METRICS;
+		x86_pmu.intel_ctrl |= GLOBAL_CTRL_EN_PERF_METRICS;
 
 	if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_timing_info)
 		x86_pmu.flags |= PMU_FL_RETIRE_LATENCY;
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
index 70d1d94aca7e..f8247ac276c4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ static inline bool is_topdown_idx(int idx)
 #define GLOBAL_STATUS_TRACE_TOPAPMI		BIT_ULL(GLOBAL_STATUS_TRACE_TOPAPMI_BIT)
 #define GLOBAL_STATUS_PERF_METRICS_OVF_BIT	48
 
-#define GLOBAL_CTRL_EN_PERF_METRICS		48
+#define GLOBAL_CTRL_EN_PERF_METRICS		BIT_ULL(48)
 /*
  * We model guest LBR event tracing as another fixed-mode PMC like BTS.
  *
-- 
2.34.1