linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next V2 0/3] in order support for vhost-net

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACGkMEv3gZLPgimK6=f0Zrt_SSux8ssA5-UeEv+DHPoeSrNBQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 10:04:25 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, eperezma@...hat.com, 
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jonah.palmer@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 0/3] in order support for vhost-net

On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 9:52 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/17/25 8:01 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 1:55 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 10:03:00AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 8:04 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, 14 Jul 2025 16:47:52 +0800 Jason Wang wrote:
> >>>>> This series implements VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER support for vhost-net. This
> >>>>> feature is designed to improve the performance of the virtio ring by
> >>>>> optimizing descriptor processing.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Benchmarks show a notable improvement. Please see patch 3 for details.
> >>>>
> >>>> You tagged these as net-next but just to be clear -- these don't apply
> >>>> for us in the current form.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Will rebase and send a new version.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>
> >> Indeed these look as if they are for my tree (so I put them in
> >> linux-next, without noticing the tag).
> >
> > I think that's also fine.
> >
> > Do you prefer all vhost/vhost-net patches to go via your tree in the future?
> >
> > (Note that the reason for the conflict is because net-next gets UDP
> > GSO feature merged).
>
> FTR, I thought that such patches should have been pulled into the vhost
> tree, too. Did I miss something?

See: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg1108896.html

>
> Thanks,
>
> Paolo
>

Thanks