[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250718020312.856168-1-lijiayi@kylinos.cn>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 10:03:12 +0800
From: Jiayi Li <lijiayi@...inos.cn>
To: rafael@...nel.org,
lenb@...nel.org
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jiayi_dec@....com,
Jiayi Li <lijiayi@...inos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: Fix initial QoS constraint application order in PPC initialization
The original initialization sequence was:
cpufreq_policy_online()
acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init()
acpi_processor_get_platform_limit()
freq_qos_update_request(&perflib_req)
blocking_notifier_call_chain(...)
acpi_processor_ppc_init()
freq_qos_add_request(&perflib_req)
This caused a race condition where the QoS request was added after the
initial platform limit update. The new sequence explicitly ensures:
cpufreq_policy_online()
acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init()
acpi_processor_get_platform_limit()
freq_qos_update_request(&perflib_req)
blocking_notifier_call_chain(...)
acpi_processor_ppc_init()
freq_qos_add_request(&perflib_req)
+ acpi_processor_get_platform_limit()
+ freq_qos_update_request(&perflib_req)
The critical change adds an immediate platform limit update after the
QoS request is registered. This guarantees that the initial P-state
constraint is applied before any subsequent updates, resolving the window
where constraints could be applied out-of-order.
Fixes: d15ce412737a ("ACPI: cpufreq: Switch to QoS requests instead of cpufreq notifier")
Signed-off-by: Jiayi Li <lijiayi@...inos.cn>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
index 64b8d1e19594..3e7fe95c21d1 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
@@ -173,6 +173,9 @@ void acpi_processor_ppc_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
unsigned int cpu;
+ if (ignore_ppc == 1)
+ return;
+
for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus) {
struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu);
int ret;
@@ -193,6 +196,11 @@ void acpi_processor_ppc_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
if (ret < 0)
pr_err("Failed to add freq constraint for CPU%d (%d)\n",
cpu, ret);
+
+ ret = acpi_processor_get_platform_limit(pr);
+ if (ret)
+ pr_err("Failed to update freq constraint for CPU%d (%d)\n",
+ cpu, ret);
}
}
--
2.47.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists