linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add ROCK 2A/2F, Sige1 and NanoPi Zero2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250719143008.54288-1-amadeus@jmu.edu.cn>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2025 22:30:08 +0800
From: Chukun Pan <amadeus@....edu.cn>
To: knaerzche@...il.com
Cc: amadeus@....edu.cn,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	heiko@...ech.de,
	jonas@...boo.se,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
	ziyao@...root.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add ROCK 2A/2F, Sige1 and NanoPi Zero2

Hi,

> The issue I was seeing is that there actually *is* a variant called
> 'RK3528' which at least according to the latest datasheets slightly differs
> from 'RK3528A'. We are doing development based on 'RK3528A' and calling it
> 'rockchip,rk3528' which might make it hard to add the non-A-variant in
> future (unless we call it 'rockchip,the-actual-rk3528').

I think this can be ignored, because rockchip only provides RK3528A chip.
RK3528A should be a revised version of RK3528, which solves some bugs,
so we have never seen the silk screen printed with RK3528.

Thanks,
Chukun

--
2.25.1