linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add ROCK 2A/2F, Sige1 and NanoPi Zero2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <24ef5e60-dcea-4102-b87f-8a5572c7497f@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:07:45 +0200
From: Alex Bee <knaerzche@...il.com>
To: Chukun Pan <amadeus@....edu.cn>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, heiko@...ech.de, jonas@...boo.se,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, ziyao@...root.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add ROCK 2A/2F, Sige1 and
 NanoPi Zero2


> Hi,
>
>> The issue I was seeing is that there actually *is* a variant called
>> 'RK3528' which at least according to the latest datasheets slightly differs
>> from 'RK3528A'. We are doing development based on 'RK3528A' and calling it
>> 'rockchip,rk3528' which might make it hard to add the non-A-variant in
>> future (unless we call it 'rockchip,the-actual-rk3528').
> I think this can be ignored, because rockchip only provides RK3528A chip.
> RK3528A should be a revised version of RK3528, which solves some bugs,
> so we have never seen the silk screen printed with RK3528.
Thanks for sharing that inside.
I wonder why there's an v1.4 of "Rockchip RK3528 Datasheet" dated
2024-05-12 which differs from v1.4 "Rockchip RK3528A Datasheet" dated
2025-05-12. Anyway: If everybody is happy as-is I guess it's fine.

> Thanks,
> Chukun
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>