[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <99977f38-f055-46ed-8eb0-4b757da2bcdd@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 08:39:52 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: SeonGu Kang <ksk4725@...sia.com>, Jesper Nilsson
<jesper.nilsson@...s.com>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Tomasz Figa
<tomasz.figa@...il.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: kenkim <kenkim@...sia.com>, Jongshin Park <pjsin865@...sia.com>,
GunWoo Kim <gwk1013@...sia.com>, HaGyeong Kim <hgkim05@...sia.com>,
GyoungBo Min <mingyoungbo@...sia.com>, SungMin Park <smn1196@...sia.com>,
Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>, Shradha Todi
<shradha.t@...sung.com>, Ravi Patel <ravi.patel@...sung.com>,
Inbaraj E <inbaraj.e@...sung.com>, Swathi K S <swathi.ks@...sung.com>,
Hrishikesh <hrishikesh.d@...sung.com>, Dongjin Yang <dj76.yang@...sung.com>,
Sang Min Kim <hypmean.kim@...sung.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...s.com, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, soc@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] Add support for the Axis ARTPEC-8 SoC
On 21/07/2025 06:50, SeonGu Kang wrote:
> 2025-07-10 (목), 09:07 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski:
>> On 10/07/2025 02:20, ksk4725@...sia.com wrote:
>>> From: SeonGu Kang <ksk4725@...sia.com>
>>>
>>> Add basic support for the Axis ARTPEC-8 SoC.
>>> This SoC contains four Cortex-A53 CPUs and other several IPs.
>>>
>>> Patches 1 to 10 provide the support for the clock controller,
>>> which is similar to other Samsung SoCs.
>>>
>> You should explain here (and in DTS patches or the bindings) the
>> hardware, that this is Samsung SoC.
>>
>> You could also explain the differences from Exynos and proposed
>> handling
>> of patches (because this is odd)
>>
>> Also, entire patchset has wrong and incomplete SoBs. Your SoB is
>> missing
>> everywhere, others have wrong order.
>>
>> Please read submitting patches first.
>>
>
> This Custom SoC is owned by the Axis (OEM) and manufactured by the
> Samsung (ODM). It has standard Samsung specific IP blocks.
It is designed by Samsung. It is Samsung SoC.
Anyway, don't explain to me, but in your patchset.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists