lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <efd70965b87382c7172495b161bfef7cfdffb431.camel@dubeyko.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 11:51:18 -0700
From: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@...eyko.com>
To: Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>, glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] hfsplus: fix to update ctime after rename

On Tue, 2025-07-22 at 01:13 -0600, Yangtao Li wrote:
> [BUG]
> $ sudo ./check generic/003
> FSTYP         -- hfsplus
> PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 graphic 6.8.0-58-generic #60~22.04.1-
> Ubuntu
> MKFS_OPTIONS  -- /dev/loop29
> MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/loop29 /mnt/scratch
> 
> generic/003       - output mismatch
>     --- tests/generic/003.out   2025-04-27 08:49:39.876945323 -0600
>     +++ /home/graphic/fs/xfstests-dev/results//generic/003.out.bad
> 
>      QA output created by 003
>     +ERROR: change time has not been updated after changing file1
>      Silence is golden
>     ...
> 
> Ran: generic/003
> Failures: generic/003
> Failed 1 of 1 tests
> 
> [CAUSE]
> change time has not been updated after changing file1
> 
> [FIX]
> Update file ctime after rename in hfsplus_rename().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>
> Tested-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@...eyko.com>
> Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@...eyko.com>
> ---
>  fs/hfsplus/dir.c | 11 ++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 

Probably, it was not very good idea to combine the HFS+ patch with HFS
patches, because I cannot take this one without others. :)

Also, from my point of view, the patchset requires a cover letter.
Otherwise, it looks slightly unusual. :)

Thanks,
Slava.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ