lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dcc38ba0-cbb4-494e-bc10-2df2b4aa2cb0@google.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 14:51:21 -0400
From: Barret Rhoden <brho@...gle.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
 James Morse <james.morse@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/resctrl: avoid divide by 0 num_rmid

On 7/22/25 2:19 PM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Barret,
> 
> On 7/21/25 11:00 AM, Barret Rhoden wrote:
>> x86_cache_max_rmid's default is -1.  If the hardware or VM doesn't set
>> the right cpuid bits, num_rmid can be 0.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Barret Rhoden <brho@...gle.com>
>>
>> ---
>> I ran into this on a VM on granite rapids.  I guess the VMM told the
>> kernel it was a GNR, but didn't set all the cache/rsctl bits.
>>
> 
> The -1 default of x86_cache_max_rmid is assigned if the hardware does not
> support *any* L3 monitoring. Specifically:
> 
> resctrl_cpu_detect():
> 	if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CQM_LLC)) {
> 		c->x86_cache_max_rmid  = -1;
> 		...
> 	}
> 
> The function modified by this patch, rdt_get_mon_l3_config() only runs if
> the hardware supports one or more of the L3 monitoring sub-features
> (X86_FEATURE_CQM_OCCUP_LLC, X86_FEATURE_CQM_MBM_TOTAL, or
> X86_FEATURE_CQM_MBM_LOCAL) that depend on X86_FEATURE_CQM_LLC per cpuid_deps[].
> 
> I tried to reproduce the issue on real hardware by using clearcpuid to
> disable X86_FEATURE_CQM_LLC and the CPUID dependencies did the right thing
> by automatically disabling X86_FEATURE_CQM_OCCUP_LLC, X86_FEATURE_CQM_MBM_TOTAL,
> X86_FEATURE_CQM_MBM_LOCAL, not running rdt_get_mon_l3_config() at all, and
> not even attempt to enumerate any of the L3 monitoring details.
> 
> What are the symptoms when you encounter this issue?

Linux crashes during boot with a divide error, and the splat backtrace 
is in rdt_get_mon_l3_config().

> Would it be possible to send me the CPUID flags of leaf 7, subleaf 0 as
> well as all sub-leaves of leaf 0xF?

# ./cpuid 0x7 0
CPUID for Leaf 0x00000007, Sublevel 0x00000000:
	eax: 00000002
	ebx: f1bf2ffb
	ecx: 1b415f7e
	edx: bc814410

# ./cpuid 0x7 1
CPUID for Leaf 0x00000007, Sublevel 0x00000001:
	eax: 00201c30
	ebx: 00000000
	ecx: 00000000
	edx: 00084000

# ./cpuid 0x7 2
CPUID for Leaf 0x00000007, Sublevel 0x00000002:
	eax: 00000000
	ebx: 00000000
	ecx: 00000000
	edx: 0000003f

> Could you please also elaborate what the impact of this issue is? Is this
> a VM that has been released with many users impacted or something encountered
> during development of this VM?

This is with cloud-hypervisor.  We do have a couple of local patches for 
running on machines with more than 256 cpus.  I didn't see anything in 
our changes related to cpuid 0x7, but maybe it's on our end.

But I imagine the problem isn't widespread and could be considered 
developmental.

I'll keep poking on my end - maybe I had some other cruft in my system 
(in the kernel build or in cloud_hypervisor).

Thanks,
Barret


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ