lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <727fa9f4-fe25-495e-9d8d-48e504fbe6b0@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 09:49:28 +0100
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
To: Mao Jinlong <quic_jinlmao@...cinc.com>, Mike Leach
 <mike.leach@...aro.org>, James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Yingchao Deng <quic_yingdeng@...cinc.com>, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: Add Qualcomm extended CTI

On 22/07/2025 09:14, Mao Jinlong wrote:
> From: Yingchao Deng <quic_yingdeng@...cinc.com>
> 
> Add Qualcomm extended CTI support in CTI binding file. Qualcomm
> extended CTI supports up to 128 triggers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yingchao Deng <quic_yingdeng@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mao Jinlong <quic_jinlmao@...cinc.com>
> ---
>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,coresight-cti.yaml | 4 +++-
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,coresight-cti.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,coresight-cti.yaml
> index 2d5545a2b49c..1aa27461f5bc 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,coresight-cti.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,coresight-cti.yaml
> @@ -84,7 +84,9 @@ properties:
>             - const: arm,coresight-cti
>             - const: arm,primecell
>         - items:
> -          - const: arm,coresight-cti-v8-arch
> +          - enum:
> +              - arm,coresight-cti-v8-arch
> +              - qcom,coresight-cti-extended

Why not call it qcom,coresight-cti ?

There are no other "qcom,coresight-cti", so "extended" is not required.
Is this specific to CPU (i.e., CPU bound) ?

Suzuki

>             - const: arm,coresight-cti
>             - const: arm,primecell
>   


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ