[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <175317903265.3058188.1426905529254051034.b4-ty@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 11:11:09 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kselftest/arm64: Test FPSIMD format data writes via NT_ARM_SVE in fp-ptrace
On Fri, 18 Jul 2025 23:03:26 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> The NT_ARM_SVE register set supports two data formats, the native SVE one
> and an alternative format where we embed a copy of user_fpsimd_data as used
> for NT_PRFPREG in the SVE register set. The register data is set as for a
> write to NT_PRFPREG and changes in vector length and streaming mode are
> handled as for any NT_ARM_SVE write. This has not previously been tested by
> fp-ptrace, add coverage of it.
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/kselftest), thanks!
[1/1] kselftest/arm64: Test FPSIMD format data writes via NT_ARM_SVE in fp-ptrace
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/b84d2b27954f
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists