[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <175317907573.3058594.12056270289383660598.b4-ty@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 11:11:18 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 0/2] Improve POE handling for uaccess
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 17:00:40 +0100, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
> This short series attempts to approach POE (Overlay) faults consistently
> w.r.t. uaccess. We currently assume that spurious Overlay faults are
> handled by retrying the access [1], but this isn't the case.
>
> Patch 1 ensures that spurious Overlay faults are indeed ignored. This
> being done, it typically isn't worth using an ISB when writing to
> POR_EL0. Patch 2 removes the remaining ISB in the signal handling code.
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/misc), thanks!
[2/2] arm64: signal: Remove ISB when resetting POR_EL0
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/1a665a71ef0f
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists