[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6dd38997-253f-4e89-88ef-b566039ff291@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 18:59:51 -0500
From: "Moger, Babu" <bmoger@....com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>, corbet@....net, tony.luck@...el.com,
james.morse@....com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com
Cc: Dave.Martin@....com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, paulmck@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
Neeraj.Upadhyay@....com, david@...hat.com, arnd@...db.de, fvdl@...gle.com,
seanjc@...gle.com, jpoimboe@...nel.org, pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com,
xin@...or.com, manali.shukla@....com, tao1.su@...ux.intel.com,
sohil.mehta@...el.com, kai.huang@...el.com, xiaoyao.li@...el.com,
peterz@...radead.org, xin3.li@...el.com, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
mario.limonciello@....com, thomas.lendacky@....com, perry.yuan@....com,
gautham.shenoy@....com, chang.seok.bae@...el.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peternewman@...gle.com, eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 29/34] x86,fs/resctrl: Auto assign counters on mkdir
and clean up on group removal
Hi Reinette,
On 7/17/2025 10:56 PM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu,
>
> On 7/8/25 3:17 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
>> Resctrl provides a user-configurable option mbm_assign_on_mkdir that
>> determines if a counter will automatically be assigned to an RMID, event
>> pair when its associated monitor group is created via mkdir.
>>
>> Enable mbm_assign_on_mkdir by default and automatically assign the counters
>> when a resctrl group is created.
>>
>> Counters allocated to a resctrl group should be released when the group is
>> deleted. Add support to unassign and free counters during the group
>> teardown.
>>
>> By default, each group requires two counters: one for the MBM total event
>> and one for the MBM local event.
>>
>> If the counters are exhausted, the kernel will log the error message
>> "Unable to allocate counter in domain" in
>> /sys/fs/resctrl/info/last_cmd_status when a new group is created and the
>> counter assignment will fail. However, the creation of a group should not
>> fail due to assignment failures. Users have the flexibility to modify the
>> assignments at a later time.
>
> I find that this changelog jumps around a bit. Below is an attempt at some
> re-organization. Please feel free to improve:
>
> Resctrl provides a user-configurable option mbm_assign_on_mkdir that
> determines if a counter will automatically be assigned to an RMID, event
> pair when its associated monitor group is created via mkdir.
>
> Enable mbm_assign_on_mkdir by default to automatically assign
> counters to the two default events (MBM total and MBM local) of a new
> monitoring group created via mkdir. This maintains backward compatibility
> with original resctrl support for these two events.
>
> Unassign and free counters belonging to a monitoring group when the group is
> deleted.
>
> Monitor group creation does not fail if a counter cannot be assigned to
> one or both events. There may be limited counters and users have the
> flexibility to modify counter assignments at a later time.
> Log the error message "Unable to allocate counter in domain" in
> /sys/fs/resctrl/info/last_cmd_status when a new monitoring group is created
> but counter assignment failed.
>
Looks good. Thanks
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
>> ---
>
> ...
>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c | 1 +
>> fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
>> index 026c2e2d19d3..e0706083fe0e 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
>> @@ -457,6 +457,7 @@ int __init rdt_get_mon_l3_config(struct rdt_resource *r)
>> r->mon.mbm_cntr_assignable = true;
>> cpuid_count(0x80000020, 5, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
>> r->mon.num_mbm_cntrs = (ebx & GENMASK(15, 0)) + 1;
>> + r->mon.mbm_assign_on_mkdir = true;
>
> This is a resctrl fs default. Should it not be set in
> resctrl_mon_resource_init()?
>
Yes. Moved it in resctrl_mon_resource_init().
>
>> }
>>
>> r->mon_capable = true;
>> diff --git a/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> index b7289ce2b3a6..645245f274e9 100644
>> --- a/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> +++ b/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> @@ -2884,6 +2884,54 @@ static void schemata_list_destroy(void)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * rdtgroup_assign_cntrs() - Assign counters to MBM events. Called when
>> + * a new group is created.
>> + * If "mbm_event" counter assignment mode is enabled, counters should be
>> + * automatically assigned if the "mbm_assign_on_mkdir" is set.
>> + * Each group can accommodate two counters: one for the total event and
>
> "Each group can accommodate two counters" -> "Each group can accommodate two counters
> per domain"?
>
Sure.
>> + * one for the local event. Assignments may fail due to the limited number
>> + * of counters. However, it is not necessary to fail the group creation
>> + * and thus no failure is returned. Users have the option to modify the
>> + * counter assignments after the group has been created.
>> + */
>> +static void rdtgroup_assign_cntrs(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp)
>> +{
>> + struct rdt_resource *r = resctrl_arch_get_resource(RDT_RESOURCE_L3);
>> +
>> + if (!r->mon_capable || !resctrl_arch_mbm_cntr_assign_enabled(r) ||
>> + !r->mon.mbm_assign_on_mkdir)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + if (resctrl_is_mon_event_enabled(QOS_L3_MBM_TOTAL_EVENT_ID))
>> + rdtgroup_assign_cntr_event(NULL, rdtgrp,
>> + &mon_event_all[QOS_L3_MBM_TOTAL_EVENT_ID]);
>> +
>> + if (resctrl_is_mon_event_enabled(QOS_L3_MBM_LOCAL_EVENT_ID))
>> + rdtgroup_assign_cntr_event(NULL, rdtgrp,
>> + &mon_event_all[QOS_L3_MBM_LOCAL_EVENT_ID]);
>> +}
>> +
>
> Reinette
>
>
Thanks
Babu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists