[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7fa90026-d2ac-4d39-bbd8-4e6c9c935b34@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 16:35:08 +0200
From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron
<bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner
<tglx@...utronix.de>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Krzysztof Wilczy´nski <kwilczynski@...nel.org>,
Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] rust: irq: add support for non-threaded IRQs and
handlers
On 7/23/25 4:26 PM, Boqun Feng wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 10:55:20AM -0300, Daniel Almeida wrote:
> But sure, this and the handler pinned initializer thing is not a blocker
> issue. However, I would like to see them resolved as soon as possible
> once merged.
I think it would be trivial to make the T an impl PinInit<T, E> and use a
completion as example instead of an atomic. So, we should do it right away.
- Danilo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists