[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1927750.tdWV9SEqCh@earth>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 11:29:07 -0400
From: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@...labora.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@...k-chips.com>,
Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject:
Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ASoC: hdac_hdmi: Use dev_info on invalid ELD version
Hi Mark,
On Wednesday, 23 July 2025 06:40:13 EDT Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 03:54:36PM -0400, Detlev Casanova wrote:
> > When disconnected, the ELD data cannot be read by the display driver, so
> > it just sets the data to 0.
>
> Please don't put patches for different subsystems into the same series
> if there's no dependencies, it just makes dependencies less obvious and
> creates hassle merging things.
Yes, sorry, I'll send v3 of this patch separately.
> > That makes the ELD parsing code read an ELD version of 0, which is
> > invalid. In hdac_hdmi, that is logged with dev_err(), but should be
> > logged with dev_info() instead as it is done in sound/core/pcm_drm_eld.c
> >
> > This avoids printing multiple messages like:
> > HDMI: Unknown ELD version 0
> >
> > in the kernel log when userspace tries to open the sound device.
>
> It doesn't, it just lowers the severity of the logs that are printed.
> If the goal is to lower the number of messages printed you need to use
> a ratelimited print.
I see, ratelimited would be good, but it still prints a message about
something that is normal behaviour. Maybe this should go further to a
dev_dbg(), or is there a specific reason to show this message ?
This could also be a special case:
- version == 0 -> dev_dbg()
- version !=0 && != known_versions -> dev_err()
Detlev.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists