[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250723164620.5ed508f9@jic23-huawei>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 16:46:20 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Cc: Akshay Jindal <akshayaj.lkd@...il.com>, anshulusr@...il.com,
nuno.sa@...log.com, andy@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: light: ltr390: Add debugfs register access support
On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 09:13:09 -0500
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com> wrote:
> On 7/23/25 6:46 AM, Akshay Jindal wrote:
> > Add support for debugfs_reg_access through the driver's iio_info structure
> > to enable low-level register read/write access for debugging.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Akshay Jindal <akshayaj.lkd@...il.com>
> > ---
> > Testing details:
> > ================
> > -> Tested on Raspberrypi 4B. Follow for more details.
> >
>
> ...
>
> > drivers/iio/light/ltr390.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/ltr390.c b/drivers/iio/light/ltr390.c
> > index ee59bbb8aa09..1f6ee0fd6d19 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/light/ltr390.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/light/ltr390.c
> > @@ -38,12 +38,20 @@
> > #define LTR390_ALS_UVS_GAIN 0x05
> > #define LTR390_PART_ID 0x06
> > #define LTR390_MAIN_STATUS 0x07
> > -#define LTR390_ALS_DATA 0x0D
> > -#define LTR390_UVS_DATA 0x10
> > +#define LTR390_ALS_DATA_0 0x0D
> > +#define LTR390_ALS_DATA_1 0x0E
> > +#define LTR390_ALS_DATA_2 0x0F
> > +#define LTR390_UVS_DATA_0 0x10
> > +#define LTR390_UVS_DATA_1 0x11
> > +#define LTR390_UVS_DATA_2 0x12
> > #define LTR390_INT_CFG 0x19
> > #define LTR390_INT_PST 0x1A
> > -#define LTR390_THRESH_UP 0x21
> > -#define LTR390_THRESH_LOW 0x24
> > +#define LTR390_THRESH_UP_0 0x21
> > +#define LTR390_THRESH_UP_1 0x22
> > +#define LTR390_THRESH_UP_2 0x23
> > +#define LTR390_THRESH_LOW_0 0x24
> > +#define LTR390_THRESH_LOW_1 0x25
> > +#define LTR390_THRESH_LOW_2 0x26
> >
> > #define LTR390_PART_NUMBER_ID 0xb
> > #define LTR390_ALS_UVS_GAIN_MASK GENMASK(2, 0)
> > @@ -98,11 +106,62 @@ struct ltr390_data {
> > int int_time_us;
> > };
> >
> > +static bool ltr390_is_readable_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
> > +{
> > + switch (reg) {
> > + case LTR390_MAIN_CTRL:
> > + case LTR390_ALS_UVS_MEAS_RATE:
> > + case LTR390_ALS_UVS_GAIN:
> > + case LTR390_PART_ID:
> > + case LTR390_MAIN_STATUS:
> > + case LTR390_ALS_DATA_0:
> > + case LTR390_ALS_DATA_1:
> > + case LTR390_ALS_DATA_2:
> > + case LTR390_UVS_DATA_0:
> > + case LTR390_UVS_DATA_1:
> > + case LTR390_UVS_DATA_2:
> > + case LTR390_INT_CFG:
> > + case LTR390_INT_PST:
> > + case LTR390_THRESH_UP_0:
> > + case LTR390_THRESH_UP_1:
> > + case LTR390_THRESH_UP_2:
> > + case LTR390_THRESH_LOW_0:
> > + case LTR390_THRESH_LOW_1:
> > + case LTR390_THRESH_LOW_2:
> > + return true;
> > + default:
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool ltr390_is_writeable_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
> > +{
> > + switch (reg) {
> > + case LTR390_MAIN_CTRL:
> > + case LTR390_ALS_UVS_MEAS_RATE:
> > + case LTR390_ALS_UVS_GAIN:
> > + case LTR390_INT_CFG:
> > + case LTR390_INT_PST:
> > + case LTR390_THRESH_UP_0:
> > + case LTR390_THRESH_UP_1:
> > + case LTR390_THRESH_UP_2:
> > + case LTR390_THRESH_LOW_0:
> > + case LTR390_THRESH_LOW_1:
> > + case LTR390_THRESH_LOW_2:
> > + return true;
> > + default:
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > +}
>
> Using rd_table and wr_table is a bit more compact than readable_reg
> writeable_reg.
Or given a lot of these are ranges of related registers you could use
ranges
switch (reg) {
case LTR390_MAIN_CTRL:
case LTR390_ALS_UVS_MEAS_RATE:
case LTR390_ALS_UVS_GAIN:
case LTR390_INT_CFG:
case LTR390_INT_PST:
case LTR390_THRESH_UP_0 ... LTR390_THRESH_UP_2:
case LTR390_THRESH_LOW_0 ... LTR390_THRESH_LOW_2:
return true;
(with macros as Andy suggested)
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists