linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 01/17] cxl/pci: Remove unnecessary CXL Endpoint handling helper functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <68815b0f224d6_134cc7100e7@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 14:58:39 -0700
From: <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>, <dave@...olabs.net>,
	<jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>, <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
	<alison.schofield@...el.com>, <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	<bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <shiju.jose@...wei.com>, <ming.li@...omail.com>,
	<Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>, <rrichter@....com>,
	<dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, <PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@....com>,
	<lukas@...ner.de>, <Benjamin.Cheatham@....com>,
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>, <terry.bowman@....com>,
	<linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 01/17] cxl/pci: Remove unnecessary CXL Endpoint
 handling helper functions

Terry Bowman wrote:
> The CXL driver's cxl_handle_endpoint_cor_ras()/cxl_handle_endpoint_ras()
> are unnecessary helper functions used only for Endpoints. Remove these
> functions as they are not common for all CXL devices and do not provide
> value for EP handling.
> 
> Rename __cxl_handle_ras to cxl_handle_ras() and __cxl_handle_cor_ras()
> to cxl_handle_cor_ras().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>

Looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>

Perhaps this and any other pure cleanups can go into a topic branch for
6.17 so that it does not need to be sent again if this set gets respun.
Dave?