[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DBJDZBYHR94V.1QGVALCL60M1X@fairphone.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 13:09:35 +0200
From: "Luca Weiss" <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
To: "Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rob Herring"
<robh@...nel.org>, "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, "Conor
Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>, "Felipe Balbi" <balbi@...nel.org>, "Srinivas
Kandagatla" <srini@...nel.org>, "Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"Jaroslav Kysela" <perex@...ex.cz>, "Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@...e.com>, "Bjorn
Andersson" <andersson@...nel.org>, "Konrad Dybcio"
<konradybcio@...nel.org>, "Wesley Cheng" <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>,
"Stephan Gerhold" <stephan.gerhold@...aro.org>,
<~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht>, <phone-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Krzysztof Kozlowski"
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-sound@...r.kernel.org>, "Dmitry Baryshkov"
<dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Enable USB audio offloading on Fairphone 4
smartphone
Hi Mark,
On Wed Jul 23, 2025 at 12:57 PM CEST, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 08:22:06AM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
>> On Wed Jul 16, 2025 at 9:19 AM CEST, Luca Weiss wrote:
>
>> > All dependencies for the patches have been applied already, so this
>> > series can land as well!
>
>> Is it still possible to pick up the sound patches (1-3) for 6.17? Dts
>> has been applied already.
>
> As previously discussed they won't apply until after the merge window.
Sorry about that, I thought the conflict was for the 6.16 merge window,
not 6.17?
The patches this depends on have been applied by you on 2025-06-09:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/174950282564.277844.4634804513095204160.b4-ty@kernel.org/
So I'm not aware of another conflict, that's why I was asking in the
first place.
Regards
Luca
>
> Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
> for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so
> on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
> please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been
> review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.
>
> Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
> all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
> directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
> anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
> some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
> for the subsystem are normally handled.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists