linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Enable USB audio offloading on Fairphone 4 smartphone

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <00c2ac7c-763f-467f-8199-76de9f5d71b0@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 13:19:08 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@...nel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
	Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>,
	Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@...aro.org>,
	~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Enable USB audio offloading on Fairphone 4
 smartphone

On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 01:09:35PM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
> On Wed Jul 23, 2025 at 12:57 PM CEST, Mark Brown wrote:

> > As previously discussed they won't apply until after the merge window.

> Sorry about that, I thought the conflict was for the 6.16 merge window,
> not 6.17?

There is a conflict.  You could check this yourself...

> So I'm not aware of another conflict, that's why I was asking in the
> first place.

You were sending a content free ping:

> > Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
> > for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so 
> > on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
> > please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
> > review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.
> >
> > Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
> > all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
> > directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
> > anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
> > some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
> > for the subsystem are normally handled.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)