[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aIDVVRS0bcdjs5q_@vaman>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 17:58:05 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Jyri Sarha <jyri.sarha@....fi>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@...com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>,
Aradhya Bhatia <aradhya.bhatia@...ux.dev>,
Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@...com>,
Parth Pancholi <parth.pancholi@...adex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/17] phy: cdns-dphy: Remove leftover code
On 23-07-25, 11:49, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
>
> (I accidentally sent my mail only to you. List added here).
>
> On 23/07/2025 10:36, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > Hi Vinod,
> >
> > On 27/06/2025 02:32, Vinod Koul wrote:
> >> On 18-06-25, 12:59, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> >>> The code in cdns-dphy has probably been part of a DSI driver in the
> >>> past. Remove DSI defines and variables which are not used or do not
> >>> actually do anything. Also rename cdns_dsi_get_dphy_pll_cfg() to
> >>> cdns_dphy_get_pll_cfg(), i.e. drop the "dsi", as it's not relevant here.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> >>
> >
> > Are you fine merging the two cdns-dphy patches (this and 4/17) via drm
> > tree? I think that's the easiest way to merge this.
> >
> > I could also drop the 5/17 patch from the series, as it's just a
> > cleanup, and it could be merged at some later point via phy tree.
>
> Actually, I take that back. Devarsh also has some cdns-dphy patches,
> which depend on my patches. It could get messy.
>
> There's no compile-time dependency, and my DRM series doesn't depend on
> the dphy changes even at runtime. I think it's best if I drop the dphy
> changes from my series and send them separately.
Okay sounds good to me.. Easier to handle that way
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists