[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250724083001.362882-2-yizhou.tang@shopee.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 16:29:59 +0800
From: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@...pee.com>
To: axboe@...nel.dk,
hch@....de,
jack@...e.cz
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tangyeechou@...il.com,
Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@...pee.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] blk-wbt: Optimize wbt_done() for non-throttled writes
From: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@...pee.com>
In the current implementation, the sync_cookie and last_cookie members of
struct rq_wb are used only by read requests and not by non-throttled write
requests. Based on this, we can optimize wbt_done() by removing one if
condition check for non-throttled write requests.
Signed-off-by: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@...pee.com>
---
block/blk-wbt.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-wbt.c b/block/blk-wbt.c
index a50d4cd55f41..30886d44f6cd 100644
--- a/block/blk-wbt.c
+++ b/block/blk-wbt.c
@@ -248,13 +248,14 @@ static void wbt_done(struct rq_qos *rqos, struct request *rq)
struct rq_wb *rwb = RQWB(rqos);
if (!wbt_is_tracked(rq)) {
- if (rwb->sync_cookie == rq) {
- rwb->sync_issue = 0;
- rwb->sync_cookie = NULL;
- }
+ if (wbt_is_read(rq)) {
+ if (rwb->sync_cookie == rq) {
+ rwb->sync_issue = 0;
+ rwb->sync_cookie = NULL;
+ }
- if (wbt_is_read(rq))
wb_timestamp(rwb, &rwb->last_comp);
+ }
} else {
WARN_ON_ONCE(rq == rwb->sync_cookie);
__wbt_done(rqos, wbt_flags(rq));
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists